It does beg the question...
All right, by now even Drudge has linked to Michelle Malkin's bit about the demonic, Photoshopped Condi.
Look, I'm not going to ascribe sinister motives to this, but you do have to wonder... what the hell were they thinking? I mean, whatever effect they were aiming for, this surely ain't it. Maybe they just wanted to heighten the contrast in her eyes or something, but don't you think they'd have at least looked at the results and said, "Hey, this looks like shit. It was better before I dorked with it."?!
Comments
She looks ugly one way or the other. No major differences.
Posted by: Blue Wind | October 26, 2005 05:50 PM
ooh, snap BW! You go girl!
Posted by: ortho | October 26, 2005 05:56 PM
Nice to see you're not above such high-brow snips, Blue.
Posted by: Adam | October 26, 2005 10:36 PM
Why hasn't the blogosphere commented on these obvious Photoshop jobs?
http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/4711/cond3600x8008sq.jpg
http://img362.imageshack.us/img362/3378/cond23nv.jpg
http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/2844/272967262ui.jpg
Posted by: Roger | October 27, 2005 12:35 AM
I have a Photoshop image related to this. Is there a way to send it?
Posted by: Paul Moore | October 27, 2005 06:40 AM
Rog, those could be honest mistakes.
Paul, you can e-mail me stuff at barry@cynicalnation.com.
Posted by: Barry | October 27, 2005 07:29 AM
honest mistakes huh?
Darn that shoe-lover!!!!
Posted by: ortho | October 27, 2005 01:09 PM