Unauthorized reproduction?
When I first saw this story linked on Jeff's site, I figured an "Unauthorized Reproduction" bill was probably some intellectual property BS designed to keep people from copying DVDs.
I wish I'd been right.
« So is this why Miers was picked? | Main | When sloppy journalism kills »
When I first saw this story linked on Jeff's site, I figured an "Unauthorized Reproduction" bill was probably some intellectual property BS designed to keep people from copying DVDs.
I wish I'd been right.
Comments
I repeat: the hell is wrong with people?!
Posted by: K | October 5, 2005 02:14 PM
JESUS TITS, WHAT THE HELL??!? Ok, that's it. We are now gonna draft a smart bill. Any retard congesssperson seen by anyone shall be immediately bitchslapped to death.
Posted by: That Guy | October 5, 2005 07:38 PM
That's your party, Barry! Reagan used to say that he didn't leave the Democratic party; the Democratic Party left him. Same goes for me and the GOP. Taken over by fanatics.
Posted by: fred | October 6, 2005 11:18 AM
Just a thought from an occasional visitor ...
draft text URL
If you drill down to the text, two things stand out immediately ...
1) Putative page 19 "(I) Personality description, including the strengths and weaknesses of each intended parent." - this will fly *how* ???
and, more importantly ...
2) *Who* are the proud sponsors of this text ? It seems to be on an official governmental site, and yet somehow it manages to avoid having this information highly visibly attached where the author(s) can claim credit ...
That latter point reminds me of the fuss about the Federal Bill introduced to reintroduce the Draft, and how "It's all a Republican plot", except that the Bill was introduced by and sponsored by Democrats only.
Ya gotta work on that cynicisn, folks, or they're gonna revoke yer "Cynical" Triangle ! And the "Gullible Nation blog" doesn't sound nearly as good, now, does it ?
Posted by: Alasdair | October 10, 2005 07:04 PM